Pelycosaur24's avatar

Pelycosaur24

Plato is watching you...
2K
Watchers
345 Deviations
219.9K
Pageviews

Ok right away... if you expect a positive review I have to disappoint you. I am sorry. I did not really intend for this to end up transforming into a rant, but I can feel it is going to happen. So consider yourself warned. If you liked this movie, thats great, I guess I just... hoped for something different!

And also Spoilers ahead, I guess.

EktthtZVkAUV9A0

So then: I did not like this movie, both as a historical statement about a paleontologist and simply as a movie. Thinking about this film two words come to mind for me: boring and insulting. And these two words pretty much coincide with the two viewpoints I have on it. As a simply movie it was unbelievably boring, the main two characters were not only terribly unlikable and boring to watch they also had NO chemistry, like... at all (thats a point even most people who liked the movie criticize). It was almost like, they knew the plot needed them to hook up and so they did, reluctantly.


If the movie wanted to be about women, it failed, as the two most interesting characters were both men.

First Roderick Murchison, Charlotte's husband. This guy had such an energy to him! He was excited, he was fascinated, he was nothing but polite, he was eager to learn. When I saw the trailer I expected they would turn him into a sexist who tries to man-splain to Mary Anning, but no! He is her greatest fan; he respects her authority, he is happy to learn from his idol. The only time I felt any emotion during this movie (beside rage) was when I was sad to realize this likeable character with an infectious fascination for fossils... would only be in like 10 minutes of the movie.

The second character I liked was the Hungarian (?) doctor. He was just so happy to be on screen. I wanted to know his story, I wanted to see how he deals with the prejudice he obviously faces, what his life was like (honestly this movie would have been like 1000 times better if it was about Murchison and the doctor being a gay couple and just travelling Europe together, I would absolutely watch that). But no... we are stuck with Karen Anning, a disgruntled, unenthusiastic person, who seems so uninterested in her own work, Charlotte actually has to remind her that she is supposed to be studying fossils.

And Charlotte... who sucks at peeling carrots, that's what I got from her character. They have literally nothing in common, I don't even know what to write about those two they are so uninteresting. Well that's enough for the "boring" part of the review.

Ammonite movie

Now let's get to the "insulting" part. This movie is insulting to a lot of people. At the top of the tier list it is insulting to Mary Anning. A young, not formally educated, working class woman from early 19th century England, who revolutionized an entire field of study, through her hard work, determination and intelligence. Who was entirely self-taught but practically created the field of paleontology. I cannot emphasize enough what a fascinating person the real Mary Anning was. And this movie has none of that. You learn nothing about Mary Anning. It gives her no recognition for her groundbreaking work. Nothing. This was the very first cinematic movie about a historical paleontologist, and it's a romance story with little to no paleontology. A story about Mary Anning should not be about romance. Not gay romance, not straight romance, not romance period. It should be about science.


Right at the end the movie gets more than just insulting, it gets hypocritical. I wanted to physically punch this movie. Karen Anning walks through the British Museum and there are all these portraits of all these mAlE sCieNtIsTS, and nO wOmEN (OMG so deep). Yeah guess what, how many of these male scientists had a movie made about them? None. You had the chance to make a movie about the Scientist Mary Anning. But you did not. If the movie would have been honest it should have added a naked portrait of Kate Winslet to that portrait aisle. That's basically what this movie is doing. These men are remembered for their science, Mary Anning, thanks to this movie, for f*cking Charlotte Murchison.


Well let's continue with the tier list. This movie insults paleontologist because it says to them: look, your most iconic representative is not interesting enough, your science is not interesting enough, we must add sex, lots of sex. Then it is insulting to female scientists in particular because in communicates to women that no matter how influential they are in their field, no matter how groundbreaking their findings are, they are still going to be reduced to their sex life. And if there is no known sex life to reduce them too....

then Hollywood will MAKE ONE UP!

EgW4LyOXoAUeTIS

And finally it is insulting to Ferenc von Nopcsa, an actually gay paleontologist, who's life would have made an excellent movie, but I guess Lesbian sex sells better.


And it's not that I am mad with this movie for trying something different. If it were a movie about Queen Victoria or Cleopatra, women we have seen hundreds of movies about, one movie exploring an interesting "what if" scenario would be pretty cool! However this was a first. Not just the first movie about Mary Anning, not just the first movie about a female paleontologist, the first movie about a paleontologist period. It was the public's first introduction to historical paleontologists, and for that to be nothing but erotic fan fiction... that is just a loss for everyone.


I can only hope that in the future we will see movies exploring what it was like to be a paleontologist in the 19th century, stories that capture the wonder and fascination, stories that inspire and teach. I hope Mary Anning and all her colleagues get the recognition they deserve.

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Hi there! :D :dance: I recently (well actually not THAT recently) created an Instagram account for my drawings. There are not that many drawings yet, but once I have a substantial base of followers I will post regularly, maybe also some behind the scenes stuff of my work :aww: so if you are interested, you can find it at "pelycosaur24" on Instagram www.instagram.com/pelycosaur24…
I appreciate every follower :heart: Instagram Icon (2016, animated) 

Or if you are interested in what I look like in real life you can also follow my personal Instagram at "Skadi_Katjusha" www.instagram.com/skadi_katjus… New Instagram Logo/Icon 

And of course there is also a Facebook page Facebook (new) Icon  specifically for everything Paleontology related at :facebook:  Paleontologists and their prehistoric pets
Again every like is much appreciated :love: it would be really cool to get to 4000 likes soon :aww: Facebook Thumbs Up Icon 
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
I first learned about the existence of this show when I accidentally stumbled on one of the sets in Vienna on my birthday last year... In case you did not know "Vienna Blood" is a three-part British-Austrian television show which aired in December 2019. It’s a detective story best described as Austro-Hungarian Sherlock. That’s literally what it is. So if you like Sherlock, definitely watch it. But of course its most distinguishing feature it its setting. Austria-Hungary is not very often featured in main-stream media and thus often overshadowed by the more well-known british-victorian settings. So I am extremely happy for this shows existence. :happybounce:

Pp2020 Vienna Blood100~ V-body  16  9 -8356d68febb by Pelycosaur24

Set in Vienna in 1906 the show actually does a really good job at capturing Austro-Hungarian culture. From the look and architecture (it was actually filmed on scene in Vienna) to the quirks of Viennese mannerism and the face palm moments of early 20th century reality. All facets of what you would expect from an Arthur Schnitzler novel are accounted for (yes there even is a duel at dawn and no shortage of suicides).

I also applaud the series for hiring mostly Austrian actors who actually can pronounce most of the names correctly.:clap:

 

Of course those who know me can guess that the character I am most excited about is Amelia Lydgate. In the series she is a scientist at the Natural History Museum in Vienna (which is my all-time favorite museum in the world). And while I really love the idea of a female scientist at this particular museum being one of the main characters I have to say... it’s kinda obvious her character was not written by someone whit a lot of understanding of what a scientist does. 

 174211 by Pelycosaur24

In the first episode Amelia claims to be involved in restauration, particularly "restoring archaeological finds". Now this would actually be a very plausible job at the natural history museum in 1906 as it had a very busy department of prehistoric archaeology (headed by Josef Szombathy - who actually is a main character in my own sci-fi story) after all this very museum staff would make one of the most well-known prehistoric discoveries in 1908 - the Venus of Willendorf. However it becomes clear very fast that the whole "restoring archeological finds" thing on Amelias part is less a clever period appropriate job actually tailored to the historical situation at the NHM in 1906 but rather someone stringing vague museum related terms together.

In the next episode Amelia claims to be a research scientist and is shown to have significant knowledge in chemistry and microbiology (she is often shown looking through a microscope claiming to study "prehistoric microorganisms"). Research scientist and restaurateur are two very very distinct professions. Both equally important at a museum, but very different.

 

But the funniest scene comes from the second episode where Amelia presents her findings to one of the detectives and is asked: "Forgive me, what is the area of your expertise?" To which she replies: "I am a scientist" I was like :facepalm: Girl, he obviously knows that... that’s why he asked for your AREA OF EXPERTISE. But nevertheless I really love her character as well as the rest of the cast. Overall it’s a really great show and I can absolutely recommend watching it.

I just read on Wikipedia that a second season is already planned. I can't wait to see more. :la:

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Today I have a little bit of a different journal entry for you! :D Yesterday my boyfriend made this super cute video of Sherlock and Feline, our two rabbits! [Bunny Emote] Love [Bunny Emote] Evil Smile 
I hope you like the video - like and share ;) (or they will eat your face like a flower after taking all your carrots) :evillaugh:

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In

It’s that time of the year again. I noticed that in recent years Americans have shown interest in the Krampus. And while I am happy to see that something from my own cultural background seems to be popular overseas, I can’t help but to notice some misconceptions…. But as you know I love nothing more than to inform where information is wanted/needed. So here we go with some misconceptions about the Krampus.

I start of with a very big one.
Krampus has NOTHING to do with Christmas.


Nothing. Yes, he does accompany St. Nikolaus. But that is the thing. In Austria (and the rest of central Europe) St. Nikolaus has nothing to do with Christmas either. He just happened to be celebrated in December. Over here he has no connection to Santa Claus. That is because we don’t have Santa Claus over here but that is a different story.

Krampus by Pelycosaur24

Traditionally on the eve of December 6th, children will be visited by a man dressed as St. Nikolaus (usually hired from the local church or hired by the parents). That is dressed in the garb of a Late Antique bishop with a bishop's crozier (staff), a colobium (cloak) and a bishops mitra (hat). He will tell the children his story – how he as bishop of the city of Myra helped the people in the 4th century AD – and present them with a burlap bag (secretly given to him by the parents on arrival) filled with nuts, apples, clementine’s and various chocolate versions of himself (you can see some examples in the image below). Then the children will usually perform poetry or sing songs and they will talk about the good and bad things they did. That’s it. There is no connection to Christmas.
Nikolaus by Pelycosaur24


That said, Krampus can be associated with St. Nikolaus but does not have to. Sometimes, Krampus will accompany St. Nikolaus to “punish” bad kids.

 Krampus gets his own holiday the previous day. Usually young men will dress up in traditional Krampus gear which consist of a cape made from goat fur, huge cowbells, hooved wooden shoes and huge (and most often very valuable) wooden masks. They then “run” down the main streets of villages and cities in events known as “Krampuslauf” which can get pretty violent but nevertheless are a huge draw (in Klagenfurt for example, usually more than 50.000 people attend). No Christmas here either.

1024px-Hl. Nikolaus in Begleitung des Krampus und  by Pelycosaur24

Now a second misconception I often hear is calling Krampus “German” or “Germanic” or “Slavic”. Each of these denominations is wrong. It would be correct to call the Krampus an “Alpine” phenomenon since it seems to be strongly influenced by the culture of the mountains and it is common in areas of several central European countries. He is not linked to any modern culture or ethnicity but rather the Alps as a geographic region. 

It is hard to tell where the Krampus comes from. Most likely he dates to a time even before the romans and represents an ancient custom to scare away the winter (however sources older than the 16th century are scarce). In several regions in the alps today similar customs still survive that involve dressing up and dancing to influence the weather.

 

Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Featured

Instagram and Facebook by Pelycosaur24, journal

Vienna Blood or Austro Hungarian Sherlock by Pelycosaur24, journal

Meet my Rabbits! by Pelycosaur24, journal

Krampus... and St. Nikolaus by Pelycosaur24, journal

So I did one of these DNA ancestry Tests by Pelycosaur24, journal